1) Do you agree that the existing walking routes shown (solid red line) are currently suitable for walking?

Partially

Please comment:

I haven't walked them, so can't comment.

2) Do you agree that the existing cycling routes shown (solid blue line) are currently suitable for cycling?

Partially

Please comment:

There aren't any.

3) Do you agree with the proposed new routes for walking (dashed red line)?

Yes

4) Do you agree with the proposed new routes for walking and cycling (dashed blue line)?

Yes

Please comment:

I've cycled this section of the Rhymney trail and it's great apart from the bridge over the river at the end of Ball Lane. The gate there is impossible to get through with a trailer, adaptive bike (for disabled people), a tandem and it's even difficult with pannier bags, baskets or child seats. If the council is serious about encouraging families to use active travel routes, then we need to be able to get through the gates and barriers!

5) Are there additional routes for walking (existing or proposed) that you think should be shown on the map?

No

6) Are there additional routes for cycling (existing or proposed) that you think should be shown on the map?

No

7) Do you agree with the proposals in the schedule of schemes for this ward?

Yes

8) Are there any additional schemes you think should be included in the schedule of schemes?

No

1) Do you agree that the existing walking routes shown (solid red line) are currently suitable for walking?

Yes

Please comment:

There is no solid blue lines in Llanrumney

3) Do you agree with the proposed new routes for walking (dashed red line)?

Partially

Please comment:

Traffic is often over the speed limit and parked cars are on the pavement

4) Do you agree with the proposed new routes for walking and cycling (dashed blue line)?

Partially

Please comment:

Speed of traffic, bikes some do not give consideration to others, riding pavement doing wheelys

If yes, please provide details below:

Not sure I would not ride a bike on the estate

7) Do you agree with the proposals in the schedule of schemes for this ward?

Partially

Please comment, including the relevant scheme reference number(s) in your comments:

You have some areas marked but not others to join them up so disjointed around the estate

8) Are there any additional schemes you think should be included in the schedule of schemes?

Yes

Please comment, including location information:

Development in other areas could cut the estate off

9) Do you have any other comments on the Draft Active Travel Network Map for Cardiff?

Llanrumney needs to be considered with other developments especially when needing to access other areas of the city. I appreciate there has to be progress but please ensure that the estate is not grid locked with traffic on events days mean there would be difficulties access other parts of the city.

1) Do you agree that the existing walking routes shown (solid red line) are currently suitable for walking?

Yes

Please comment:

These are pavemented areas so yes, easy to walk

2) Do you agree that the existing cycling routes shown (solid blue line) are currently suitable for cycling?

No

Please comment:

I cant see any solid blue lines

3) Do you agree with the proposed new routes for walking (dashed red line)?

No

Please comment:

The proposed route is on pavemented area. Is this correct that you are 'Proposing ' people now walk on pavements that are already there and have been in use for many many years?

4) Do you agree with the proposed new routes for walking and cycling (dashed blue line)?

No

Please comment:

This is not a new route. It has been there for many years

5) Are there additional routes for walking (existing or proposed) that you think should be shown on the map?

Yes

If yes, please provide details below:

The path leading from Hartland road to connect to the path that leads to up to rumney gardens. Path over the bridge needs cutting back and the top path that is next to the park and ride needs to be extended to then make a circuit and also needs to be extended so that you can use the subways without getting extremely muddy in inclement weather

6) Are there additional routes for cycling (existing or proposed) that you think should be shown on the map?

Yes

If yes, please provide details below:

The path leading from Hartland road to connect to the path that leads up to rumney gardens. Path over the bridge needs cutting back and the top path that is next to the park and ride needs to be extended to then make a circuit and also needs to be extended so that you can use the subways without getting extremely muddy in inclement weather

7) Do you agree with the proposals in the schedule of schemes for this ward?

Yes

Please comment, including the relevant scheme reference number(s) in your comments:

I live on browning close and sometimes can not get out of the road/ into the road due to cars on Thackeray being in the way

Please comment, including location information:

The lane and bridge over to the back of the church next to the unicorn pub needs to be better. The path that leads around that area neefs to ve improved and widened for runners, walkers and cyclists to be able to travel safely from the back of arnold avenue over to llanederyn village/ st ederyns

1) Do you agree that the existing walking routes shown (solid red line) are currently suitable for walking?

Partially

2) Do you agree that the existing cycling routes shown (solid blue line) are currently suitable for cycling?

No

Please comment:

Cannot locate any solid blue lines

Please comment:

I feel that the dashed red lines should continue on Elgar crescent until it meets countisbury avenue, then a zebra crossing to interlink with the pathway that runs straight down Sedgemoor hill. This makes walking safe for all children living this side of Llanrumney. This area of Countisbury avenue (where Elgar meets) is a dangerous hotspot and needs attention especially as promoting active travel

4) Do you agree with the proposed new routes for walking and cycling (dashed blue line)?

Partially

Please comment:

Again I feel that the proposed lines have not interlinked with a large section of Llanrumney , there should be more branches making sure all parts have access, maybe continuing down Countisbury avenue where it meets Burnham avenue to Rach all perimeters

5) Are there additional routes for walking (existing or proposed) that you think should be shown on the map?

Yes

If yes, please provide details below:

See above

6) Are there additional routes for cycling (existing or proposed) that you think should be shown on the map?

Yes

If yes, please provide details below:

See above

1) Do you agree that the existing walking routes shown (solid red line) are currently suitable for walking?

Partially

2) Do you agree that the existing cycling routes shown (solid blue line) are currently suitable for cycling?

Partially

3) Do you agree with the proposed new routes for walking (dashed red line)?

Partially

4) Do you agree with the proposed new routes for walking and cycling (dashed blue line)?

Yes

5) Are there additional routes for walking (existing or proposed) that you think should be shown on the map?

No

6) Are there additional routes for cycling (existing or proposed) that you think should be shown on the map?

Yes

If yes, please provide details below:

Along Ball Road and Burnham avenue to link through to Old St Mellons

7) Do you agree with the proposals in the schedule of schemes for this ward?

No

Please comment, including the relevant scheme reference number(s) in your comments:

Isn't enough

8) Are there any additional schemes you think should be included in the schedule of schemes?

Yes

Please comment, including location information:

Too vague to know what you envisage